Unveiling NATO's News Conduct in the Conflict with Russia

In the past day or two, there have been several significant events that indicate a shift in behavior and approach from the West. It appears that there is a simplistic attitude towards the credibility of public opinion, both regarding the dissemination of lies and fake news by the media of these countries and their understanding of the internal situation in Russia.

Taking a closer look at the initial months of the war, it is worth noting that the British media consistently attributed numerous health issues to Russian leaders, highlighted significant political disagreements and military divisions among Kremlin officials, and even published false news about the Russian people opposing the war with NATO. However, today, they seem unwilling to acknowledge or discuss these matters, which clearly demonstrates the stark contrast between the media's fabrications and the actual reality on the ground.

From the experience I have acquired over these past few months, I have reached the conclusion that none of the news disseminated by the Western media should be relied upon. The extent of falsehoods present in these news reports is truly astonishing. Initially, I believed that these news stories only influenced ordinary individuals, but I have witnessed even the most ardent supporters being deeply impacted by and unquestioningly believing these fabrications in a perplexing manner.

Observing the significant level of trust placed by individuals who are well-versed in media and news manipulation, it became apparent to me that Western entities have effectively identified where to allocate their resources. This realization underscores the importance of vigilance regarding the behavior of the West in response to various events. To counteract the dissemination of falsehoods in the media, it is crucial to establish an independent analysis room for unbiased examination and evaluation.

In recent weeks, there have been numerous attacks on the Kerch bridge, which connects Crimea with mainland Ukraine, by NATO members. These attacks involve the use of French and British cruise missiles, which belong to the same family. Additionally, French-made UAVs and helicopters are occasionally involved in these assaults. The overall outcome of these attacks, which would not be possible without the permission, cooperation, and support of the United States, is met with strong retaliatory responses from the Russian army. These responses often result in significant destruction of Ukraine's infrastructure at each instance.

Interestingly, American military officials have expressed their opposition to these attacks. According to CNN, a senior American defense official, who preferred to remain anonymous, stated, "While these deep attacks may slightly disrupt the Russian balance, they do not have a decisive impact. " It is likely in the best interest of all parties involved to concentrate on counterattacking instead.

The extent of deceit and falsehoods adopted by the Americans in the Ukrainian war is unparalleled. Their intention seems to be sending a message to the Russian side that they oppose the attack on the Crimean bridge, in order to avoid becoming targets of Russian retaliatory operations. Additionally, it is anticipated that in the coming weeks, when widespread destruction occurs, no American entity will be held accountable, and the blame will be shifted onto Zelensky as per usual.