If the Netanyahu government continues to reject negotiations, the anticipated military victory of the Israeli army over Hamas will not enable Israel to better integrate into its regional environment," says Renaud Girard, a writer for the French newspaper Le Figaro.
The author believes that even if Lebanon's Hezbollah continues to refuse to open a real second front against Israel, peace in the Middle East is not imminent. However, in an interview with ABC News that aired on February 11, 2024, Netanyahu said that "victory is within reach" and that the Israeli military will destroy the last Hamas groups that have established themselves in the populous city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip.
Girard asks: After the Israeli army could not find Yahya Sinwar in either Gaza City or Khan Yunis, can it now find him in Rafah, where more than a million displaced Palestinian civilians have taken refuge?
The author suggests that Israel's goal is not only the destruction of Hamas but the complete eradication of the Palestinian movement to prevent a recurrence of the October 7 attack, allowing the settlers to secure their interests.
He added: In the short term, the Israeli government at war must consider a trade-off: in exchange for the effective military cleansing of the Rafah region, what human catastrophe is it willing to commit in order to secure the release of how many Zionist prisoners?
The pressures on Israel's military government from both external and internal sources are significant. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, and Germany have all cautioned against the catastrophic humanitarian impact of any potential invasion of Rafah. President Joe Biden publicly stated that Israel had exceeded what was initially deemed acceptable in their retaliatory measures.
Inside Israel, protests are escalating in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, with demonstrators urging Netanyahu to prioritize negotiations for the release of detainees. The author argues that Israel owes these protesters and their families a great deal, as the policy and security failures of Netanyahu's cabinet are what led to their captivity.
Girard believes that by the end of spring 2024, Israel can assert that security conditions have been restored, Hamas's military power has been eliminated, and Israel has regained its deterrent power against Arab nations, regardless of the methods and mechanisms employed.
Girard adds that a two-kilometer buffer zone will be established in the northern Gaza Strip, with equipment and devices imported from the United States to facilitate the construction of this zone. This development is expected to reduce habitable areas for the two million Palestinians residing in Gaza.
Netanyahu aims to reinstate military rule in Gaza, similar to the period from 1967 to 2005. However, the question remains whether the European Union and the Persian Gulf oil countries will support this request.
According to Girard, the long-term outlook for Israel appears uncertain and somewhat grim, as Israel has inadvertently united the entire Arab-Islamic world against itself. The Shia-Sunni religious conflict, reignited by the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Iraq from 2003 to 2023, had overshadowed and marginalized the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, Hamas has now succeeded in bringing the Israeli-Palestinian issue back to the forefront of regional and global attention in its own manner.
The author raises a critical point by questioning whether the Israeli army will truly achieve victory over Hamas, despite Netanyahu's use of the term "victory" in his interview with ABC. The more pressing question is what lies ahead for Israel in the region even if it emerges victorious. It is essential to consider whether Israel will be able to successfully integrate into the regional environment and what implications this may have for its future.
The emphasis is placed on the notion that Israel's assertion of never making peace or negotiating with Hamas is merely a claim. The crucial factor when dealing with an adversary of unequal power is not just their tactics, but their level of popularity among the people with whom peaceful coexistence is desired.
The addition highlights the perspective that, whether Israel agrees with it or not, Hamas is seen as the representative of the Palestinian people. Therefore, it is suggested that Hamas should be included at the negotiating table and invited for discussions alongside entities like the Fatah movement or key regional actors such as Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.
Girard argues that Jews and Arabs possess distinct mentalities that hinder their ability to coexist harmoniously. Therefore, he believes that the two-state solution, despite its challenges in terms of geography and demographics, is the only viable long-term resolution. Without this solution, Gerard suggests that Israel may never achieve peace in the region, integration may remain unattainable, and the country could potentially face its own collapse and downfall.
Girard warns that if Israel refuses to accept the two-state solution and persists in its stubbornness, it risks being drawn into an endless war that poses a significant threat to Israel's very existence.
News ID : 2911